(no subject)
1 August 2019 10:40https://shaunaaura.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/how-do-we-pay-for-all-this-memberships-tithing-and-pagans/
Very, very good post abour community building. I've read it three times since I found it last night.
The stuff about money itself isn't super salient to me right now; instead I'm more interested in what she says about community. This isn't just a post about paying your tarot reader, it's about the deeper problem of trying to create community from people who have busy lives, and some of the cultural factors going on there.
This in turn leads to a money problem. But I think she's right that creating a sense of "emotional buy in" to "our community" is essential. But difficult to get started and maintain. I've been doing a lot of Outreach/Orientation work for the Rebellion over the last few weeks, and reading Shauna's blog -about venue hire and facilitation and running events - strikes very true to my experience. And similarly what I see from Rebellion participants is absolutrly that sense of buy in -hundreds of volunteers doing insane quantities of volunteer work and setting up their own parts of the organisation, the kind of effort and buy in which would make a Pagan community hum in no time. Greenies also have no money; but we never struggle to make room hire.
But what the Rebellion have is a "hook", a thing people are interested enough in. Right? Even though a lot of people are interested in Pagan community, I'm not quite sure that hook is there. It is in theory, but in practice...another factor is the interpersonal. This volunteer-work structure works when there's trust and affinity between individuals, rather than individuals interfacing with an organisational front. Like, if I asked my friends to come over and help me bake, it's a different dynamic than putting a request on Facebook. Strong organisations perhaps have to start from a group of friends or family, who already work together well and have that trust.
(We've been watching Sons of Anarchy, which is about a biker gang. A lot of the original biker gangs came out of WW2 or Vietnam, groups of men with a shared experience of war and who wanted something similar to army life, and who had a shared experience of not fitting back into society well and wanting an alternative structure for that. I think that provides a lot of commonality for community to form around. Especially if members fought together.)
Part of the problem is, the infrastructure is simply not there to get started. I have a group of Christian friends who started their own church, but they were already in a congregation together. I think a sufficiently large or established coven, or a network of covens, or the organisers of pagan festivals and foundations who have a network of friends, are the right people to do this work - building on the people they can already draw from, and their experiences of what works and doesn't work.
Part of the problem is distance. The idea od a local church is that it's local. If I run a Pagan community hall or organisation, in practice it's going to have a catchment area and lack appeal to people outside of that. I'm super housebound, so there's limits to how far I can travel.
But for the Rebellion, I make it out the house and hours away several times a week, so again it's - how do we cultivate that sense of Pagan community being very important? Perhaps it just *isn't* important. Or its important in a vague and holistic way, but never the most urgent or top priority thing.
The final thing is community-training. My Orientation talk contains a lot of stuff about training new Rebels to behave as part of the organisation. We have hand signals, for example, and we need to explain to them how our groups organise and work together. I think aspiring Pagan community groups could really benefit from this. Shauna writes about trying to get away from a capitalist mode of exchange. In the Rebellion, we use decentralised organising, training members how to avoid hierarchy, take personal responsibility for their parts of the protest, and take steps to act and feel empowered to do so. Rather than being passengers or audience, training them to have direct stake in the group. I think this would be essential to make Shauna's model work. You would have to ensure eyour membership did not think they were "paying for something I will be provided", because then you think in terms of value gained ("do I like their courses?") Rather than building soketjibt they are a part of. The question we ask in Orientation is "Do yoy want to be a part of realising the vision?" - and those words are chosen carefully, I think.
Very, very good post abour community building. I've read it three times since I found it last night.
The stuff about money itself isn't super salient to me right now; instead I'm more interested in what she says about community. This isn't just a post about paying your tarot reader, it's about the deeper problem of trying to create community from people who have busy lives, and some of the cultural factors going on there.
This in turn leads to a money problem. But I think she's right that creating a sense of "emotional buy in" to "our community" is essential. But difficult to get started and maintain. I've been doing a lot of Outreach/Orientation work for the Rebellion over the last few weeks, and reading Shauna's blog -about venue hire and facilitation and running events - strikes very true to my experience. And similarly what I see from Rebellion participants is absolutrly that sense of buy in -hundreds of volunteers doing insane quantities of volunteer work and setting up their own parts of the organisation, the kind of effort and buy in which would make a Pagan community hum in no time. Greenies also have no money; but we never struggle to make room hire.
But what the Rebellion have is a "hook", a thing people are interested enough in. Right? Even though a lot of people are interested in Pagan community, I'm not quite sure that hook is there. It is in theory, but in practice...another factor is the interpersonal. This volunteer-work structure works when there's trust and affinity between individuals, rather than individuals interfacing with an organisational front. Like, if I asked my friends to come over and help me bake, it's a different dynamic than putting a request on Facebook. Strong organisations perhaps have to start from a group of friends or family, who already work together well and have that trust.
(We've been watching Sons of Anarchy, which is about a biker gang. A lot of the original biker gangs came out of WW2 or Vietnam, groups of men with a shared experience of war and who wanted something similar to army life, and who had a shared experience of not fitting back into society well and wanting an alternative structure for that. I think that provides a lot of commonality for community to form around. Especially if members fought together.)
Part of the problem is, the infrastructure is simply not there to get started. I have a group of Christian friends who started their own church, but they were already in a congregation together. I think a sufficiently large or established coven, or a network of covens, or the organisers of pagan festivals and foundations who have a network of friends, are the right people to do this work - building on the people they can already draw from, and their experiences of what works and doesn't work.
Part of the problem is distance. The idea od a local church is that it's local. If I run a Pagan community hall or organisation, in practice it's going to have a catchment area and lack appeal to people outside of that. I'm super housebound, so there's limits to how far I can travel.
But for the Rebellion, I make it out the house and hours away several times a week, so again it's - how do we cultivate that sense of Pagan community being very important? Perhaps it just *isn't* important. Or its important in a vague and holistic way, but never the most urgent or top priority thing.
The final thing is community-training. My Orientation talk contains a lot of stuff about training new Rebels to behave as part of the organisation. We have hand signals, for example, and we need to explain to them how our groups organise and work together. I think aspiring Pagan community groups could really benefit from this. Shauna writes about trying to get away from a capitalist mode of exchange. In the Rebellion, we use decentralised organising, training members how to avoid hierarchy, take personal responsibility for their parts of the protest, and take steps to act and feel empowered to do so. Rather than being passengers or audience, training them to have direct stake in the group. I think this would be essential to make Shauna's model work. You would have to ensure eyour membership did not think they were "paying for something I will be provided", because then you think in terms of value gained ("do I like their courses?") Rather than building soketjibt they are a part of. The question we ask in Orientation is "Do yoy want to be a part of realising the vision?" - and those words are chosen carefully, I think.