(no subject)
2 September 2020 14:34I was trying to explain to my husband today the difference between a walk and a ramble, the latter term being one I've adopted recently to denote a particular kind of time out of doors.
The word walk rather reminds me of what you do with a dog - you take them out for an hour, around the neighbourhood. I think of family holidays where I'd be driven to a car park, we'd get out and spend an hour going up a path to a viewing point, then back, and back into the car to drive for another 20 minutes to the next walk - this artificial, tourist's activity, sort of abstracted from any *reason* our ancestors had to make ways through the forests and exercise our legs.
Whereas a ramble - ah! What does a ramble say to me? Bilbo Baggins with a hand-drawn map and a blackthorn staff, the Famous Five carrying a picnic of home-made chutneys, the children of Stand By Me going on an eternal afternoon's adventure to find a dead body, Apaches playing in the farmyard: an unmapped, boundless time, hemmed in by neither clocks nor formal plans, only the commitment that an afternoon will be thoroughly wasted ambling about in the countryside. By implication, a proper ramble may not lead you home at the end of the day, but to a little inn eight villages away, where they will put you up after a dinner of rustic cheese and a beer. This is what we were supposed to do with the wilds: for a few hours, we are explorers, or wanderers, or drop-outs and idlers, just being and bimbling.
A ramble demands you bring a wet-weather clothes in a bundle, just in case, as well as hearty snacks and water - perhaps a book; there's no time you have to be back, and nowhere you need to be; perhaps you'll find a nice spot and nap for a couple of hours - or find you have travelled a great distance. In part, it's about making-real those expanses in your mind.
When in The Machine Stops, Forster writes:
The word walk rather reminds me of what you do with a dog - you take them out for an hour, around the neighbourhood. I think of family holidays where I'd be driven to a car park, we'd get out and spend an hour going up a path to a viewing point, then back, and back into the car to drive for another 20 minutes to the next walk - this artificial, tourist's activity, sort of abstracted from any *reason* our ancestors had to make ways through the forests and exercise our legs.
Whereas a ramble - ah! What does a ramble say to me? Bilbo Baggins with a hand-drawn map and a blackthorn staff, the Famous Five carrying a picnic of home-made chutneys, the children of Stand By Me going on an eternal afternoon's adventure to find a dead body, Apaches playing in the farmyard: an unmapped, boundless time, hemmed in by neither clocks nor formal plans, only the commitment that an afternoon will be thoroughly wasted ambling about in the countryside. By implication, a proper ramble may not lead you home at the end of the day, but to a little inn eight villages away, where they will put you up after a dinner of rustic cheese and a beer. This is what we were supposed to do with the wilds: for a few hours, we are explorers, or wanderers, or drop-outs and idlers, just being and bimbling.
A ramble demands you bring a wet-weather clothes in a bundle, just in case, as well as hearty snacks and water - perhaps a book; there's no time you have to be back, and nowhere you need to be; perhaps you'll find a nice spot and nap for a couple of hours - or find you have travelled a great distance. In part, it's about making-real those expanses in your mind.
When in The Machine Stops, Forster writes:
"You know that we have lost the sense of space. We say “space is annihilated”, but we have annihilated not space, but the sense thereof. We have lost a part of ourselves. I determined to recover it, and I began by walking up and down the platform of the railway outside my room. Up and down, until I was tired, and so did recapture the meaning of “Near” and “Far”. “Near” is a place to which I can get quickly on my feet, not a place to which the train or the air-ship will take me quickly. “Far” is a place to which I cannot get quickly on my feet; the vomitory is “far”, though I could be there in thirty-eight seconds by summoning the train. Man is the measure. That was my first lesson. Man"s feet are the measure for distance, his hands are the measure for ownership, his body is the measure for all that is lovable and desirable and strong."
this is a little of what I mean by rambling establishing the existence of physical space - Man is the measure. And so, by retransforming the world from a collection of little nodes that I am driven between, and a rigidity of time which demands when we must be where, it is transforming, really, an entire landscape - or at least, our experience of it.